Sunday, July 11, 2010

The Motivation to Collaborate


Do people want to interact as part of a group? On a fundamental level (at least in a historical sense) people have learned that cooperation is sometimes necessary in order to achieve certain goals. Once you define said goals I believe it is necessary to understand a person's motivations for helping a collective group; e.g. is there coercion? what is the value of the individual in the sociocultural view? does the individual have a choice?

Rheingold suggests that there are certain reasons why someone would help or share with others that generally involve some reward or benefit for the individual; I agree with this statement. Whether it be survival or the chance to accumulate more wealth, individuals will work together not through a biological drive, but as a measure to receive reward,achieve recognition, or to avoid punishment. I think that this is especially prevalent in the shrinking world that has been created by the internet--the individual is being lost in the collective that is the World Wide Web. I would argue that collaboration in the sense of Wikipedia is an attempt for some to share their knowledge, but for others it is an attempt to be heard or recognized. Collaboration does not always produce positive results and it is imperative that interactions within the educational setting are appropriately monitored to ensure that positive and productive progress is being made towards predefined goals.

Tools for collaboration can be used effectively to support Constructivist learning and situated cognition provided that the interactions between members are facilitated by a knowledgeable person to model behaviors for students. Wikispaces, Glogster, and Google Docs are widely available and free tools that encourage active learning through collaboration. Members of a class or team can use the medium to create and share knowledge to solve problems while also providing feedback to each other, which is especially useful for building a sense of community that is not limited by time or location. An important aspect of online collaboration is that all of the material is dynamic and users can share videos or digital recordings and see a record of their progress. The instructor in this environment challenges students by asking questions, encouraging peer interaction, and providing appropriate tools for students to incorporate into their projects. Tools are important, but no matter how intuitive the technology a model needs to be in place for students to observe and reflect upon to build meaningful connections to the information that has been presented.

2 comments:

  1. The collaboration tools that are available to us today are amazing. It is unfortunate that some people use these tools for negative reasons. I have witnessed several altercations in school that began over what someone posted on a social networking site. Adults also spread this negative energy. Imagine what the world could be like if we used this same energy for good!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Excellent Post! You stated that "tools for collaboration can be used effectively to support Constructivist learning and situated cognition provided that the interactions between members are facilitated by a knowledgeable person to model behaviors for students". So many times educators do not use all of these useful tools effectively because of lack of knowledge. This is why I think that furthering your education [especially in Educational Technology] has enabled us to understand certain technological advances that are beneficial to our students and our school. Do you ever think that we [educators/school system] will get to the point where everyone sees the importance of technological tools and their positive effects on collaborting learning enough for an entire staff to want to use it---even the seasoned teachers?

    ReplyDelete